Do You Need A Compensation Consultant?Do You Need A Compensation Consultant? The time will come when you find yourself between a rock and a hard place at work.  Your ability to produce project deliverables will be challenged by staff shortages, multiple projects simultaneously...

Read more

Do You Value Your Customer-Facing Jobs?Do You Value Your Customer-Facing Jobs? Have you ever walked out of a store because of poor customer service?  Or felt frustrated because the company representative at the other end of the phone did not seem to care?  Or after enduring a bad...

Read more

Why Managers Don't Manage PayWhy Managers Don't Manage Pay When an employee is promoted to their first manager’s position, they are given the proverbial Keys to the Kingdom – your company.  They now have the authority to spend your company’s money.  From...

Read more

The Great Christmas Giveaway

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 21-12-2016

Tags: , , , , ,


gifts-by-stevendepoloEveryone and their brother-in-law will be soon heading out of the office for a well-deserved Holiday break.  Those who remain can look forward to a (usually) relaxed week between Christmas and the New Year.  Time enough away from chirping phones and multiple meetings to ponder where your Compensation function is heading, and do you want to go there?

Approaching the end of the year attention has already begun it’s inevitable tilt toward, “what are we going to do next year”?  Compensation managers and practitioners will have their hands full for the next few months, balancing the need to effectively close out this year, while at the same time preparing for the next.

Which is a fertile environment for practitioners to mutter, “I’m so busy.  If our compensation programs aren’t broken and in pieces, let’s leave them alone. We have other fish to fry.” Unfortunately that attitude, while perhaps understandable during a busy time of year, is effectively saying, “let’s stay the course.  Let’s continue into next year with what we’ve been doing this year.  Who’s complaining”?

The Complaint

But instead, perhaps there should be a shout of alarm (picture me raising my hand from the back of the room).  A basic premise of having effective reward programs (they perform the way they were intended, delivering desired results to employers and employees) is that you need to periodically check.  You need to kick the tires.  Even though your car is running fine today, and tomorrow and even the next day, eventually problems will develop and it will stop running effectively.  That’s why you schedule a checkup.

So how do we know that the incentive plans continue to run effectively, aren’t wasting money, aren’t creating inequities and aren’t fostering employee discontent?

Points to Ponder

While you’re sipping some Christmas cheer and munching on too many Holiday cookies please take a moment to reflect on what might be considered weaknesses in how you approach transition reward (end of year / start of year) practices.

  • Incentive Review Paperwork: You have forms meant to assess performance for your annual management incentive plan (or others).  Does anyone read them?  Is the language consistent with the rating?
  • Last Minute Objectives: Annual objectives should have been settled by the end of the first quarter.  If managers are still writing them now, in order to coincide with activities that took place, you have a problem.  You are spending reward monies on self-fulfilling goals.
  • Let’s Give Away More Incentives: Have a look-see at who is eligible for your incentive programs.  Because there’s pressure these days to lower the eligibility further into the organization,  increasing the ranks of those being given the “opportunity.”
  • Let’s Have More of the Same: You’re busy; I get it.  But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t review the design parameters of your annual incentive plan(s).  To make sure the plan still supports business objectives.  Otherwise you’ll simply repeat whatever didn’t work this year.
  • Win-Win Scenario:  Make sure you spend enough time ensuring that your new incentive plan(s) will have significant payouts only if the company is successful as well.  It’s nice to worry about the mechanics of ensuring competitive and equitable incentives for the employees, but if the company isn’t winning as well, you’re throwing money away.  After all, the plan is (should be) intended to incent employees to deliver a successful year for the company.  There should be no guaranteed payments.
  • Leave the Games for the Kids: The payroll costs for an incentive plan are typically very large. As best you can make sure that performance = reward remains your guiding principle.  Avoid the gamesmanship of vague objectives, sloppily written assessments and even manipulation of results to ensure payments.

If something is amiss with your incentive design and administration your employees will know.  They might be silent when ineffective practices benefits them, but will howl like the Ghost of Christmas Past if they feel they’re not being fairly treated.

While this may be the season of giving, please make sure that both your company and your employees receive the gift of equitable reward for performance rendered.  That should be a gift that pleases everyone.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

A Practitioner’s Recipe For Success

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 20-12-2016

Tags: , , , ,


Whenever I come across self-help materials intended to assist Compensation practitioners with their professional growth I often notice an overly large emphasis on the technical side.  Also, when reading internet blogs meant for the same audience there again seems a constant litany of how-to guidance on, again, technical issues.

That’s all well and good, but . . . .

It seems to me that becoming a master technician in the compensation “science” is not by itself going to be an effective strategy for success in the corporate world.  In fact, sometimes that technical prowess can prove a bit of a hindrance, as it could limit upward opportunities.

True story: During my career the President of a nationally known retail chain interviewed me for the top Compensation job.  He later said to his CHRO, “Hire this guy. He has a personality.”

My checklist of Useful Competencies

If you rely solely on your technical capabilities, while remaining in your cubicle all day, and if you’re saddled with the personality of a troll, you’re going to have an uphill struggle toward success.  You’re going to need more to work with, so print this checklist and tape it to your office wall – where you can see it every day.  It could save your career.  You must:

  • Be flexible: Be willing to listen and keep an open mind.  Become known as a problem solver. Do not quote policy except as a last result.  Have a reason for your actions that can be easily explained.
  • Understand the business and how Compensation impacts it:  You’re not on an island cut off from the rest of the business.  Learn how what you do interacts with and has an effect on the business. What you do should relate to and support organizational objectives.  If not, know why not.
  • Have a personality:  Basic stuff, but have a ready smile, greet people, shake hands and in general show a warm side to those you interact with. Become an engaging person.  Oh, and try to be sincere about it.
  • Don’t be a Geek / Nerd: Don’t spend all your time spouting technical language and showing off charts & graphs.  As if all those figures are self-explanatory and you’re merely the spokesperson.  That data should be the backdrop to your explanations, not the focus.  Don’t be an analyst when you need to be a leader.
  • Be able to work a room: Leave the introvert at home and develop the skill of being comfortable holding multiple conversations in a room of strangers, colleagues or even senior leadership. That will build your image in a positive way.  If you’re an introvert, work on it.
  • Be persuasive:  You will not get too far by dictum, so work on your reasoning and communication skills.  You need to  be able to influence others, to gain agreement on the strength of your rational arguments.  “My way or the highway” does not generate a warm response.
  • Become the one who gets lots of Christmas cards: That’s your goal for next year, to be someone that colleagues think of when preparing their lists.  That is usually a good sign, because they like and / or respect you.  PS – I’m not counting stamped signature cards from consultants and vendors.
  • Play (a bit of) politics:  I don’t like this one, but it’s true.  Politics exists in every organization, so you need to be able to play the game at least a little.  Don’t think that you can “stay above the fray,” as you’re a professional or some such rot.  The powers that be will eat you alive. But as best you can try to remain neutral and project yourself as someone that all sides can trust.
  • Yes, be technically proficient:  Of course you still have to know what you’re talking about (the science of Compensation), but the higher up you climb the food chain the less reliance you’ll need on your personal technical capabilities.  You will become valued and judged for what else you bring to the plate.

Nowhere on this list will you find the ability to rattle off the overtime exemption criteria for the FLSA, or the salient rating descriptions in your point factor evaluation scheme.  And nobody is going to swoon when you describe linear regression, correlation coefficients or the difference between the Cost of Living and the Cost of Labor.  Your audience, your clients, your senior management will expect more.

But if they like you, if you have an engaging personality and can work well with others, well then, you’re half way there.

Do Not Limit Yourself

Unless you want to.  Unless you are someone who prefers the technical work, to the exclusion of the managerial side of the craft.

Those employees are out there.  I have met them.  They are happy with what they do.

But if your repertoire of competencies leans too heavily toward excel spreadsheets and data analysis your ability to “pass through the curtain” from the hard side of Compensation (technical) to the soft side (managerial) will be limited.  Because Master Technicians tend to remain just that, both by competency and by interest.

Likely you have seen your own examples of individual contributors (technicians) who have been promoted beyond their capabilities – or their interests.  Those employees are rarely successful.

So pick and choose.  If you want to go through the beaded curtain be certain to bring more along with you than a calculator and a spreadsheet.

Warm up that smile!

Are You Kidding Yourself?

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 12-12-2016

Tags: , , , , ,


rose-colored-glasses-by-florence-luongAs a manager within your organization you’re expected to provide leadership and direction for those employees who report to you.  Likely that requirement is a key accountability in your job description, and fulfilling that mandate means that you’ll have to make decisions that impact your employees – for good or ill.

Bummer.  Not everyone is comfortable with that responsibility being part of a Manager’s role.

From the perspective of senior management a key leadership expectation surrounds the handling of the employee performance review – and those future pay actions (rewards) that are based upon that assessment.  The boss has placed the ball squarely in your court to render those decisions.

Well, are you a tough manager with high expectations, or do you have a “rep” as an easy rater – as someone easy to please, someone who hesitates to make up or down decisions about their employees?  Do you feel that all employees deserve an annual raise?  Are you reluctant to discriminate of the basis of job performance?

Perhaps you have a tendency to consider decisions based on emotional factors (employee needs and wants), versus on the basis of business-related practicalities (performance assessment, company affordability, most deserving, budgets, etc.)?

Well, you probably say, the truth is that it’s a matter of balance; that managers need to weigh both factors (employer and employee) in trying to do the right thing.

True enough in concept, but such a balanced approach suggests use of a carrot and a stick – as well as a bit of a giveaway.

Signs of a “Softie”

Easy-to-please managers believe in giving as many employees as possible as much reward as the company will allow, with the expectation that recipients will:

  • Be grateful and work harder out of personal thanks
  • Be satisfied and not quit
  • Recognize the manager as someone looking out for them

These managers are kidding themselves, wearing rose colored glasses, thinking that emotional pay decisions are going to deliver results that help them (the manager), and maybe even the organization (there’s that unfortunate priority again).

Why Emotional Decisions?

Managers have a choice, and what unfortunately comes naturally for too many untrained folks is the tendency to protect themselves.  Many still think of themselves as supervisors or even individual contributors, not members of the organization’s leadership cadre.  In basic terms they still project the so-called “employee side,” versus the “company line” (that’s how they see it).

  • They want to be liked: They want to be a friend as well as a boss.  They still remember sitting on the other side of the desk.  So they empathize.
  • They avoid career-impacting decisions:  They’d prefer that someone else play judge and jury with an employee’s career.  Or let the performance figures speak for themselves (“numbers don’t lie“).
  • They don’t support the company’s pay program:  These are the ones who tell employees, “I wanted to do more, but HR wouldn’t let me.”  They fail to defend reward policies, preferring to be seen as being on the employee’s side.
  • They’re afraid someone would quit:  Because that might be a reflection on them as a manager.
  • It’s really about them:  Having employees unhappy for any reason usually means more work for the managers themselves.  It could mean extra attention to subordinate work (vs. their own), recruiting and training replacements, doing the work themselves to fill in, etc.

These managers are not helping the organization; they’re not even managing.  What they’re doing is administering the pay programs as if they didn’t have a decision-making role to play as part of the leadership team.  It’s managing from a distance – being the disengaged leader.  Let someone else make the decision.

For sure it’s not easy for some new managers to “flip the switch” and start thinking like one of the leaders of the organization.  But when they took on the mantle of “Manager” they stepped up to additional responsibilities.  They’re no longer “one of the boys,” but now the boss of those “boys.”

Those who wear rose-colored glasses to make reward decisions are in truth ineffective managers, who over time will harm the organization through their inability to make the effective, objective decisions that impact the employees who work for them.

Managers?  They’re kidding themselves.

Rising Up From Failure

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 01-12-2016

Tags: , , , , ,


amelia-cat-by-brownpauIt’s happened to me, more than once, and likely has happened to you as well.  Rejection.  Failure.  The boss or even senior management didn’t go for your idea.  Maybe they weren’t even nice about it.  You might have thought that your recommendations were good ideas, but they didn’t gain you the approval you had hoped for (too expensive, too controversial, too complicated. etc.).  But hey, you can fix things and get back in there to pitch your proposal again.

But what if the rejection was more complete, a one word NO and the meeting ended.  What if you were shown the exit before really getting into the details.  You zigged and they zagged.  You missed the boat and the boss wasn’t afraid to tell you so, and even by how far you had missed the mark.  Ouch.

Now what do you do?  Before you head for the aspirin, or other pain relievers, let’s take a look you might approach the before, and then the potential after of any presentation.

The Before

To get ready to pitch an idea to your boss, or to senior management for that matter, it’s best not to “wing it” when getting your presentation ready, but instead to thoroughly prepare yourself.  You might set up a checklist to help you remember some do’s and don’ts.

  • Remember the formula for any proposal:  State the problem, then the impact and ongoing cost.  Pause then to let the gravity of the circumstances sink in.  Then offer a solution (your proposal), followed by how the problem would be solved, along with projected costs.  Finally, paint a picture of the success to be achieved because your proposal has been approved.
    • These are the basics, taken from any good compensation manual.  Now also consider the rest.
  • Don’t try to overwhelm with facts and figures:  You’re a professional and already have their trust, that you know what you’re doing.  So focus on the key program changes and only use summary statements and figures.  You don’t have to “prove” your case with reams of data.
  • Get ready for “gotcha” questions:  They will come, so prepare by asking yourself – what do you think they will ask?  Are there possible glitches that should be addressed early on?  Survey your staff for devil’s advocate thinking.
  • Double check your figures and your text:  Sounds minor, but don’t let yourself stumble over embarrassing math errors or typos.  And yes, someone will notice.  Highlighting even a minor error could prove a costly distraction in the middle of your presentation.

Now you’re ready.  But being ready only assures a smooth presentation.  Something can still go wrong.  Don’t be blinded by a personal bias toward your work that may not be shared by those responsible for making the ultimate decision.

If everyone smiles and you get a green light, you needn’t read any further.  But if you play the percentages it’s likely that something will slide off the tracks, from a minor mishap to a major derailment.  If so, what do you after the meeting?

The After

Your reaction to a “failed” presentation depends a great deal on the specific aspects of what went wrong, who said what to whom, and whether your proposal needs a band aid or major surgery.  But consider a few basic responses that should serve you sell.

  • Making adjustments:  Listen to what they said, nod your head and commit to reviewing your materials and the resubmitting in a fashion that addresses their concerns.  Get back into the fight!
  • A different perspective:  Think hard about why you didn’t win the day.  Maybe they have a perspective that you hadn’t considered.  Maybe they raised concerns that you hadn’t addressed.  Learn from the experience.
  • Half a loaf is better than nothing: There’s nothing wrong, and a lot of good that can follow compromise.  Even if the powers that be won’t approve everything you asked for, take what you can get.  Getting halfway to a goal positions you better than remaining at the starting gate.  Next time you’ll move even closer.
  • A defeat is seldom unconditional:  Even if your proposal was rejected, you raised important issues and created a dialogue with the decision-makers.  That’s a good thing.  You also got them thinking, and likely created an environment where raising the same issues again (in a revised format) will likely receive a better reception.

So don’t give up when your precious ideas and recommendations get slapped down.  Instead get up, brush yourself off, adjust your thinking as necessary and prepare to fight another day.

Why Have a Pay Structure?

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 21-11-2016

Tags: , , , ,


Once an organization reaches a certain size in employee population it’s been typical practice for the Human Resources department to replace an ad hoc compensation / reward process with a more structured program.  And part of that program development, a key element in fact, is the establishment of a base salary (pay) structure.  Here you will have an ascending hierarchy of grade designations (your position is a grade “x,” mine is a grade “y”, etc), coupled with ranges that indicate a minimum to maximum value (salary) for each grade.

While distinctions in design can vary amongst organizations the central point of having a uniform structure is very much commonplace in both for-profit and non-profit organizations.

You probably see the “but” coming, don’t you?

Startups and Small Businesses

Just the other day one of my clients, a young and fast growing high tech company, explained to me that they didn’t use grades or salary ranges.  They didn’t have a pay structure.  They felt that they didn’t have the time to develop a standardized reward program. “We’re moving too fast,” the CHRO told me, and “We don’t have the time, people or money to focus on an HR project.”

That’s a common response for start-ups and small businesses.  The feeling is that there aren’t yet enough employees to start building an HR infrastructure.  Everyone knows everyone else’s first name and the company Christmas Party could be held at a restaurant.  Also, business leaders are too engaged in more important endeavors: getting the business off the ground, developing products and services and setting up mechanisms to sell their offerings.

Therefore these first generation employees are usually paid on the basis of:

  • Whatever the individual employee could negotiate
  • Whatever the company felt it would take to get chosen candidates to join, or
  • Setting of fixed rates for everyone in a particular job

Little thought is given to pay relationships (equity) or even the short term (?) impact on payroll expense.  The focus is lock set on creating a business, of getting the ball rolling.  Even job titles become an afterthought, with resultant title inflation slowly infecting the organization, and no one has a job description.

I get that.  That’s the reality of getting a business off the ground.  HR takes a back seat.

But it can’t last.

Paying The Piper

Eventually these poor compensation practices will start to cause real pain within the organization, similar to how too much sugar inevitably causes tooth cavities in children.  Payroll gets out of hand (too high), inequity amidst the staff starts to cause employee relations issues and managers begin to see valued employees becoming disgruntled and heading for the exit.

By the time management starts to realize they have a problem, not only have the problems grown serious and disruptive, but those pay practices that no one cared about earlier have now become ingrained into the small company’s culture. Now it’s not going to be so easy to change course.  Now management risks angering some employees even as they try to steer the ship away from the reefs.  Some of those employees could be valued contributors.

Time and again I’ve been asked by clients to help them develop their first compensation structures, to assist them as they struggle to work through numerous employee-related challenges and deal with a bloated payroll.  Aside from the mechanics involved in setting up a new pay structure (market pricing, job evaluation, salary range width, midpoint differentials and assigning jobs to grades) overcoming past practices and precedents, dealing with the employees themselves, becomes a real challenge.  A painful challenge.

For example:

  • Disconnecting inappropriate job titles is sometimes easier said than done.  Employee egos and self-identification have been blown out of proportion, but to make someone take a step back is difficult.
  • Dealing with outliers who either pop out the top of a salary range, or fail to meet the minimum level.  When faced with a competitive pay structure to replace the ad hoc and laissez faire suddenly some employees are found to be overpaid, while others are underpaid.
  • Facing the cost implications of the above.  Raising someone to the minimum value of a pay range is an easy decision, but what if there are many employees so affected?  And if an employee has been with you for awhile, raising them to the minimum can still be perceived as a slap in the face.
  • Setting grade assignments that reconcile a job evaluation system, competitive market pricing results and internal equity.  Think of a juggling act where everyone is a potential critic.

So do yourself a favor.  Pay attention to germinating pay issues even as the business passes through its stage 1 and stage 2 development.  Then, when it’s time to standardize and structure your reward programs you will find the road ahead all the smoother for your efforts.

What Is A Reward?

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 16-11-2016

Tags: , , , ,


Confidence, by petesimonWhen you think of the cumulative payroll expense being distributed to your employees, do you consider that amount of money a cost to the business, or as an investment in business success?  I’ve heard both terms used, usually along the lines of a glass being either half full or half empty.  It’s all about how you look at the same figure.  Do you value the employee contribution, to the tune of “X” number of dollars, or do you consider that amount too much of a necessary evil that constantly needs to be monitored, minimized and even cut?

This isn’t a trick question.  Because it’s a legitimate response to say you value your employees, while at the same time you want to minimize their cost to the company.  It’s all about being effective and efficient.  You want to spend what you need to spend for the right caliber of employees.  Not more and not less.  So you’ll need a balanced program of employee rewards that provides the right motivation for your employees (attract, motivate, retain), while not wasting money by overspending for the same level of performance.

The Right Reward

What programs or policies do you count as being a reward for your employees?  Payment for performance, yes, but also aspects of your work environment (what one experiences when they work for you) that makes employment more enjoyable for your employees.  Cash of course, but how about a subsidized cafeteria?  What about tuition reimbursement, an on-site clinic, a credit union, or perhaps product / service discounts?  Ask yourself, what other programs, policies or initiatives are either provided or available to employees in your organization that help make the working environment a more pleasant place to be for all those hours every week?  Or, what can you do?

Because the almighty dollar will only get you so far.  The pool is limited, of course, and to managers it’s a basic, though simplistic and automatic response to employee needs.  Many managers will stop right here though, because after giving out cash the rest of the value proposition (what employees value)  can be hard work to identify, implement and administer.

Think about it.  How many other somethings offered by your organization bring a smile to your employees?   To have them talking positive about your organizations to family and friends?  Find out what those goodies are, because those are valued and become considered as a reward for working there.

They don’t have to be large programs, or expensive offerings; just what is meaningful to the employees.  But it takes putting your thinking cap on.

Cash Is King, But . . . .

Every organization is different, with myriad characteristics, infrastructures, cultures and degrees of financial strength, so it’s hard to point at something and say, “do this.”  But if you presume that cash is not always going to be available, try something else as well.  Try lots of somethings.

  • Benefits: Not just the core programs that almost every organization provides, but perhaps there are other initiatives whose availability would be appreciated, whether funded by the company, by the employee or via a proportional split.  My wife still remembers the job where I was able to buy her roses at work, or take care of the dry cleaning from my office.  Both were fully employee-paid, but were convenient and appreciated.
  • Work-Life: Do you expect your employees to maintain a “live to work” or a “work to live” mindset about their job? It matters.  Look at your PTO policies, remote access for employees, job sharing, or simply the ability to periodically work from home.  Do you have the latest hardware and software technology?  How about health and wellness programs, or initiatives that get you involved in your community?
  • Performance & Recognition: You hire an employee to do their job, but do you also provide performance feedback along the way? Encouragement?  Improvement assistance?  Counseling?  Do you show appreciation and behavioral reinforcement to foster more desirable efforts?  Do you highlights achievers for the contributions they make?  Celebrate employees doing their jobs.
  • Development & Career Progression: Do you treat employees like an electrical appliance – plug them in work them until they fail? Or do you provide challenges as well as opportunities, learning experiences that enhance capabilities, perhaps coaching / mentoring / training experiences? Are you really investing in your employees?

The value of rewards is in the eye of the beholder.  If I have an opportunity to gain something that I value, then attaining that “something” because of where I work is a reward.  Whatever it is, it may not work for other employees, but if I value it, then it works like the proverbial carrot on a stick to provide me with motivation, with appreciation of my employer and ultimately more and better effort on my part.

You may have your own somethings where you work, and they could coincide or differ with my own.  Such is the strength behind the Value Proposition – which has morphed into a cafeteria-style menu of rewards and opportunities, cash and non-cash.

Have a care though, because going down the value proposition road requires more work on your part than simply doling out more cash.  But the rewards to you and your organization will be worth it.


Rewards For The Right Reasons

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 16-11-2016

Tags: , , , ,


Boba Fett Reward, by pasukaru76If you have an employee working for you, why would you give them an increase to their base pay?  I’m presuming though, that there’s a review program (annual?) in effect so that employees don’t have to come to you, hat in hand to ask for a raise.

When reflecting on their merit review / pay increase programs, here are the reasons I typically hear for granting individual rewards.

  • Good job performance: In recognition of delivering good or better job performance during the review period.
  • Tenure: Employees who have been around for a long time deserve “something” to recognize and reward their continuing loyalty.
  • Peanut Butter Spread: Popular in low merit spend years (lot of those lately), the thinking is that making distinctions is not “worth the effort,” so “Let’s give everyone the same raise.”
  • Everybody wins: Part of the popularity effort by many managers is the belief that all employees should get something.   They try to avoid being judge and jury about the linkage between performance and rewards.
  • They need the money:  The soft-hearted approach, when managers make emotional vs. business decisions.  An employee’s personal circumstances become a pay decision consideration.  And if one doesn’t need the money?  Chances are some of their portion might be shifted elsewhere.
  • I don’t want them to quit:  Another aspect of the manager popularity effort and a cousin of the “Everybody wins” tactic, is where a manager ignores or downplays job performance and reward distinctions to ensure an employee doesn’t get angry and then decide to leave the organization.  Because a decision to look elsewhere might negatively impact the manager.  Self interest conquers all.

You’ll notice that I put “good job performance” at the top of my list.  Is it at the top of yours?  Sad to say I often see that requirement placed further down the list in many organizations.  While everyone would agree that performance is important, we’re talking about money here, about discriminating among employees.  So the counterargument from pay-for-performance critics is that there are other things to consider.

Basic Rule of Thumb

But what if those reward dollars were coming out of your own pocket?  What if you acted as it you owned the business, and that the merit spend monies came from you, not from off a money tree or from some other constantly renewable source?  Then the decision becomes, either give monies to “deserving” employees, or keep it for yourself.

If that was the case, might the decision making process become more objective, might focus more attention on the ROI gained for the reward monies being spent, and might you expect managers to do a better job at actually managing their employees?

A basic rule of thumb in human factors management is that job performance that has been recognized and rewarded is going to be repeated.  Conversely, employees will find little encouragement to continue unsatisfactory behaviors and performance if they realize that pay increases are not automatic, and that an accounting of some sort will actually take place.

Sit on your butt and get nothing.

Critics and Naysayers

With that vein of thinking I would suggest that pay increases granted in advance of performance is also a bad idea.  I’ve heard some pundits, in their criticism the performance appraisal process say, “Let’s ignore the past (performance) and instead reward employees for future effort.”  Doesn’t that sound like a bribe?  And if the employee doesn’t perform well enough to warrant the monies already given, would there be a pay claw back later on?  I don’t think so.

Some other pundits (p4p criticism #2) suggest that dangling pay increases in front of an employee – as a form of motivation – is a wasted effort.  Their belief is that employees will perform well anyway, as some form of internal self-worth will propel them to work hard.

  • When high achievers and Joe Average receive the same / similar increase, whose performance do you think is encouraged and will be repeated?
  • How many of your employees “perform well?  100%?  Probably not.  So already this theory ignores a segment of your population.
  • Well-intentioned and self-motivated employees will eventually run out of steam (think of a battery) unless recharged by recognition and reward.
  • Your organizations risks encouraging a “Why bother?” mentality, which when coupled with a higher percentage of Joe Average in your workforce, is a recipe for serious difficulties.

So have a care that your reward monies go to the right employees, and for the right reasons.  Less than that is wasted money.

Rewarding The Right Employee

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 08-11-2016

Tags: , , , ,


This question may sound like a no-brainer, but when you think of your organization’s pay-for performance compensation program, do you feel that you are recognizing and rewarding the right Business meeting, by freedigitalphoto.comemployees?

And who exactly is that, you may ask?

  • It is not everyone
  • It is not those employees who managers feel need the increased pay
  • It is not the employee who has been busy all year
  • It is not the employees with the greatest length of service
  • It is not the employee that everyone likes

What your definition should be, is that the right employee is whomever has performed well above the crowd of other employees during your rating period.  Those who you can rightly call high achievers.  Those whose resignation would cause you to lose sleep at night.  Everyone else can be an afterthought.

Now that was easy, wasn’t it?  Like I said, a no-brainer.

It Doesn’t Work That Way

But what’s that, you say?  That’s not exactly how things work in your organization?  There are other considerations besides performance?  So that perhaps the right employee doesn’t always get rewarded?  Or whatever they receive isn’t much more than that given to Joe Average?

Why do you do that?  Let’s consider the likely culprits:

  • Not much money to go around:  This is a common argument when merit budgets are tight; that when you can’t make much of a distinction when granting reward percentages, you don’t make much of a distinction with your rewards.  Proponents would say, “Let’s just push the EASY button and give everyone the same raise.”
  • Everyone deserves something:  The “It’s not my money” tactic, where emotion overrules business sense.  If an employee hasn’t seen fired then they should get something for sitting around for twelve months.  Hasn’t inflation increased for everyone?
  • Performance ratings are overblown:  Here is the current new age thinking, where performance shortcomings are the fault of the system.  That somehow monetary rewards have little to do with future performance, so why should we discriminate amongst employees?  The system is rigged.
  • Somebody might quit:  This is every manager’s fear, of course,  but in our case this trepidation can lead to greater interest in providing pay increases that would retain the staff.  If an employee quits it’s likely going to mean more work for the manager, and potential criticism from their bosses.
  • I want to be liked:  An attitude especially prevalent among new managers, who want to build a collaborative team environment (“We’re all in this together”).  They can be reluctant to play the judge and jury about performance assessments and pay increases for their “team.”  Many would rather blame Human Resources.  They don’t want to be disliked by anyone.

Making The Hard Decisions

Rewarding the right employee becomes essentially about the manager being willing and able to make discriminatory decisions about an employee’s job performance and effectiveness as an employee with the organization.  That is, if you presume that pay increases are not “owed” on the basis of tenure (“It’s been twelve months.  Where’s my pay increase?”).

Because the budget for pay increases is always going to be tight  There will never be enough money for everyone, so an effective manager has to choose how best to spend their available reward dollars in a way that generates the best return for the organization.  Yes, that’s right – for the organization.

In some cases this means that Joe Average may not receive an annual merit increase this year, even if their performance has been ok / satisfactory / meets expectation, etc.

Making these decisions is not easy.  But it’s not supposed to be.  That’s why (tongue in cheek) the managers make the big bucks.  Then again, perhaps if it was the manager’s own money being spent the answers might not be so hard to find.

You know who the right employees are.  Put your money there.

Everything Will Be Alright

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 24-10-2016

Tags: , , , , ,


. . . is not the same as “everything will stay the same.”Big Changes Are Underway, by milena mihaylova

Most folks will tell you that change is good; that new ways of doing things, new ways of thinking and new ways of viewing the business environment are all for the good.  And then they pat themselves on the back as forward-thinking examples of the modern age.

But how about when those very same changes affect them?  When their pattern of activity is disrupted?  When what they were comfortable with now becomes alien to them?  When the advantage of the knowledge they once had is gone, and they have to learn again?  When their advantage over other employees disappears as everyone is changing at the same time?

What about when their feelings of self-confidence, of superiority in some cases, are dashed?

Then perhaps they might not feel so warm and fuzzy about change.

That’s just how it is with the human condition.

When Change Occurs

Imagine if you will the manager / leader / boss who sits comfortably within their world-at-work, their office (or wherever) environment.  They’ve been around the block several times so they know how things work.  They know the policies, the procedures and even all the right players that they have to deal with.  They can answer most any question that comes their way, or can at least bluff their way through.  When problems arise they can choose to either deal with it or kick the can down the road.

Self confidence is the hallmark of their work persona, in that they feel that they’re sitting on top of their work world – and they like the view.

Then suddenly the planet shifts on its axis.  Word comes down from above that a major new program is going to be implemented, utilizing new technologies, new forms and procedures and a whole new way of thinking.  Policies will be changing and leadership expectations are suddenly going in a whole new direction.

Oops.  Now your world has been rocked, because now you face a learning curve similar to that faced by many of your peers and colleagues.  Now you no longer have the answers, but are left with a series of questions – like everyone else.

Now your self confidence has been shaken, your warm bubble of comfort shattered.

Perhaps you go through a step process of bafflement, anger, denial, resentment, and then what?  Baying at the moon isn’t going to help, so you’d better get your new act together.

Dealing With the Dark Days

First off, I never recommend keeping your head in the sand and hoping that the bad dream goes away.  Or to play the passive resistance card (lukewarm interest and support, all while keeping your fingers crossed).  Good leaders don’t go there.

What I suggest is that you embrace the change, as best you can.

  • First onto the boat gets to pick the seat, so an early and visible advocate gets to be seen as such and able to position themselves well going into the future.  You also get to present yourself as still in leadership mode, this time leading the charge into the unknown.  “Come on, follow me!”  Good management technique.
  • Let’s face it though, learning new techniques, new technologies, the cutting edge of anything can serve you well in your career.  So you have to deal with a short (?) period of uncertainty, but likely you’ll come out ahead when the changes are implemented.  Otherwise, being seen as a legacy player has limited appeal to your senior management – who are watching.
  • A corollary to the above is that, by throwing your weight behind the change you position yourself well politically (like that’s not important?).  Early supporters of new initiatives get noticed and remembered by executives pushing those changes.  Not a bad thing for you.
  • Even if the change doesn’t work out as planned (when does it ever?), there’s likely little downside for you to have played along as a team player.  When the dust settles and the score is counted it’s usually the passive resisters and active critics who are remembered in a negative sense.  Senior managers have memories too.

Someone once said, “The only thing that’s constant is change,” or words to that affect.  Which means that sitting on your bum for too long can be harmful to your professional career.

I do agree that change can be a pain in that bum, and usually inconvenient to many of the affected.  But we need positive and constructive change to progress as a business, as a society, and as an individual.

It’s going to happen with or without you.  Let’s make it happen with you.

Who Cares About Compensation?

Posted by Chuck Csizmar | Posted in Articles, Universal Compensation | Posted on 12-10-2016

Tags: , , , , ,


darth-grader-by-jd-hancockSpoiler alert!  This article doesn’t have a happy ending.


What if you worked in an organization where the Head of Human Resources didn’t view the Compensation function as vitally important to the organization?

I once worked in such a place.  Though I wasn’t in a leadership role at that point the lesson learned was telling.  We weren’t invited to critical HR planning sessions, my boss was never a member of the inner HR circle, and the department’s list of annual objectives never included a compensation project.

It’s bad enough when the senior leadership doesn’t give you the time of day, but when your own Chief Human Resources Officer seems to agree that your role is a secondary appendage to the organization chart, whew!  That’s not a place to build a career on.

So What’s Wrong With Compensation?

Where does this attitude come from?  The possibilities are legend, but the culprit is usually the personal perspective of the people in charge.  For some reason these HR leaders consider the Compensation function at best a necessary distraction from the business of Human Resources.  Of course I have my opinions, but it’s just that.  You likely have your own.  Some examples of those HR Leaders who do not value the Compensation function:

  • The HR Generalist:  Here is the all-purpose Human Resource leader, who (typically) has gained their top position through experience in staffing, employee relations or organizational development.  It is unusual for this office holder to have cut their teeth in either Benefits or Compensation.  Specialty areas may be a mystery to them, a bit too cut and dried for their “It depends,” or “How can I help you?” style.  They don’t wish to be viewed as the “gatekeeper.”
  • Working the Chairs: This senior leader didn’t rise through the ranks in HR, but only stopped there along the way.  So their strengths may be in Finance, Marketing, or another functional area.  They need to gain HR experience before they move on.  These folks don’t usually understand or appreciate the role of Compensation, and sometimes confuse it with payroll.
  • The Political Animal:  The genesis of this leader may be either of the above roles, but while leading HR they’re focused on what will please top management.  Thus potential controversies that are often generated by new program ideas are frowned upon.  They may want to be considered a “business partner,” but to get there are often accused of being “yes men.”  Unfortunately that negative label doesn’t go away once they reach the Executive Team.
  • Retiree-in-waiting:  Bob is going to retire in a couple of years, and senior management has decided to “park” him in HR until the going away party.  Bob will not rock the boat, will seldom initiate new programs and has written the book on how-to administration and program maintenance.

Sound harsh?  These are real people that I have seen and experienced during the course of my career.  Others may consider them exceptions, which I hope is the case with your career.  Because with these leaders rarely does the nice guy with their nose to the grindstone actually win the day.  For them it would appear that image and exposure are more important than performance.

What Can You Do?

The answer rests with you, and what your career aspirations might be.  For some it’s ok to sit back as the on-site compensation administrator and simply keep things afloat.  Maintain the status quo, keep the bosses happy and if problems crop up, kick the can down the road in the hope that the challenges will go away by themselves.

Not your cup of tea?  Well, you can rattle the bars of the professional cage that’s restricting you – with questions, recommendations, warnings and red flags to gain attention, but that might prove more of a distraction and irritation to the powers that be and ultimately prove career ending for you – at least with that employer.

You can leave.  Start searching for a better role model in a Leader, and an HR Department that upholds the integrity of its role in the organization.

What I don’t think you can do is somehow magically change the attitude of the HR Leader styles mentioned above.  Those are ingrained attitudes firmly held and you’d be swimming upstream trying to make a difference.

So the trick is to avoid getting into a career hole in the first place.  Easier said than done, I’m afraid.